The Measurement Group

Improving outcomes in health, behavioral health & social services through applied social research

Helping innovative programs
improve their quality and
document their impact.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Anti-Racism Statement
  • Contact

A resurgence of qualitative methods

February 23, 2015 By Lisa Melchior Leave a Comment

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

I recently blogged about my growing appreciation of qualitative and mixed methods approaches to evaluation, even though I was originally trained in quantitative psychology. It turns out I’m not alone! It seems that we are in the midst of a resurgence of qualitative methods. An article by Gergen, Josselson, and Freeman was published in the January 2015 issue of American Psychologist — the flagship journal of the American Psychological Association – titled, “The Promises of Qualitative Inquiry.” The article notes the addition of the Society for Qualitative Inquiry to APA Division 5 as “an invigorating and enriching expansion in the vision of psychological inquiry and its potentials.” One aspect of the inclusion of qualitative methods in Division 5 is APA’s publication of a new bi-annual journal, Qualitative Psychology.

In my professional life, my work is multidisciplinary, but mostly bridges the worlds of psychology (from my graduate training and professional licensure) and program evaluation (from years of postdoctoral experience and hands-on evaluation of healthcare and social services. Qualitative methods are “hot” now in evaluation too – the American Evaluation Association AEA 365 blog had a week recently dedicated to qualitative evaluation-related topics (January 2015) and has another one this week.

Why the renewed interest in qualitative methods? In his article Pursuing Excellence in Qualitative Inquiry, Kenneth Gergen describes it as part of transition in psychological science, with a shift to “a new pluralism.” From my own experience, I think that the richness of description that qualitative methods allow resonates with people. Qualitative findings “make sense” to research and evaluation stakeholders – that is, the people who use the information for decision-making, program improvement, and sharing a program’s successes, challenges, and lessons learned.

Filed Under: Program Evaluation, Psychology, Research Methods Tagged With: Lisa Melchior, Program Evaluation, psychology, qualitative methods, The Measurement Group

5757 Uplander Way, Suite 200
Culver City, California 90230
310.216.1800


The Measurement Group (TMG) is a consulting firm specializing in the application of scientific program evaluation methods for health and social services.

Since 1988, TMG has helped programs assure and improve quality and document their impact. TMG focuses on working with innovative programs designed to reach underserved and vulnerable populations.

We are happy to answer any questions that may arise, and we look forward to speaking with you soon.

Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D.
President

Contact Us

Copyright © 2022 · Outreach Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in